Having the Courage (and the Smarts) to Just Say No

“Just walk away, Renee,
You won’t see me following you back home.
The empty sidewalks on my block are not the same,
You’re not to blame.”
– The Left Banke

Ummm, no...

We fired a prospect today.

Or, to put it more politely, we elected to adhere to our corporate and personal values, trust our instincts and cut our losses.

Either way you put it, we walked away from a potential client in the midst of a stunningly long economic slow-down that all of us are just plain tired of talking about.

Why? Because it made sense. And dollars and cents.

We had had two exceptionally good meetings with the management team of a start-up here in North Carolina. Over the course of those sessions and a bevy of phone calls and emails, we felt we’d built up quite a rapport with them. In fact, we left the last meeting pretty much being told “You guys get us completely, and we’re looking forward to working with you.” We were smiling.

Now, our radar had been going off every now and again during our meetings as the company has yet to build a working version of its product that they believe will revolutionize their industry. All they have now is a prototype, a couple of patent pendings, manufacturing partners and money from friends and family. But if the product works as they hope, it very well could revolutionize an industry that touches virtually every one of us at home, work and school.

“If the product works…”

In our 26-plus years in this business, we can’t count the number of folks who came to us convinced they were going to revolutionize the world with a “groundbreaking,” “cutting-edge,” “truly innovative” (as if anything can be “falsely innovative”) and “game-changing” idea. (Think dot-coms here whose business plans were written on the backs of napkins.) But that’s not the main reason we declined (politely) to ask these guys to the prom. The primary reason was understanding and respect – a lack of understanding of what public relations is and an apparent lack of respect for it.

Yeah, yeah, we know; no real news here. But the lesson is still an important one.

As they are bootstrapping the company at this point, there’s just not a lot of extra cash sitting around. We understand tight budgets. Who doesn’t? So they had asked if we would consider keeping our fees low in the beginning and taking equity in exchange for some of the dollars. In all our years, we had never agreed to trade fees for equity, but this time we decided to give it a try as the product is seriously cool and would be a blast to help launch (assuming it works, of course).

We wrote our proposal to cover the usual stuff you cover in a strategic communications program: branding, messaging and the development and execution of an integrated public relations program. The budget was modest. Like really modest. Like way below six figures to support a regional launch (followed then by a national launch) over the next nine months. Pretty standard fare for a PR proposal, right? And we included a suggested budget split of two-thirds in cash and one-third in equity. We submitted the draft proposal for review.

The next day, the marketing veep writes back:
(1) the president will never approve a budget like this;
(2) you really ought to consider revising your fee structure and stretch it out over a longer period, say two or three years;
(3) you can have “profits interest” not equity (meaning we’ll get paid if and when they are profitable); and
(4) by the way, we’ve been talking to another firm that does marketing and design and it looks like you’re proposing to do work that overlaps with them. We need you to do the PR, not branding and messaging.

Now we’ve never been hesitant to put our credentials up against anyone, and we rarely, if ever, have backed down from a pitch. But this felt different. This felt as if we were being asked to be only a media pitch shop (“Just get us some PR so everybody in the U.S. hears about us. You know, send out some news releases and get ’em placed in the trades.”). He was seeing that age-old delineation between public relations and marketing/advertising. “Those guys will handle all the branding, messaging and all the marketing because they know how to do; we just need you to get us ink. And that really shouldn’t cost all that much, should it? Because we don’t have that much money right now, and we’ll have to pay the other firm.”

Heck, the prospect even struck through the word “marketing” when we used it in the term, “marketing public relations.” Clearly, we’re not speaking the same language much less being on the same page.

Now we’re not saying there’s anything wrong with being media specialists. Quite frankly, I admire folks who slog away at that every day and achieve meaningful results for clients. Gosh knows, they earn their pay, and it’s not something I want to do full-time (heck, I’d be on top of a book depository with a .30-06 inside of three weeks).

But the main point here is that being a media shop is not what Forge Communications was founded to be, it’s not what we want to do and we know that’s not how we can best help build value for our clients. We know firms that do that well for much less money, and we’re happy as mollasks to recommend them.

We believe we contribute most when we are full and equal partners on the business leadership team. We bring the most to the table when we’re allowed – wait, that’s wrong – when we’re invited to offer counsel and service that’s based on decades of experience helping companies of all shapes and sizes solve challenges so they can move into the future with confidence. When strategic communication consultants are told to keep their opinions to themselves and just stay put in the traditional “media shop box” – especially when traditional media are dissolving in front of our eyes( and may well be the wrong channel to use in the first place) – both the consultants and the clients lose. And neither we nor clients like it when scarce financial resources are squandered.

In this case, we decided a win-win could best be reached if we just walked away. No blood, no foul.

This really needs no caption...

You gotta know when (and here’s the important part) and be willing to fold ’em for your business and the client’s business.

And you know what? It feels really, really good.

 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Having the Courage (and the Smarts) to Just Say No

  1. Wow, great post. It sounds like you made the right decision. Too bad you had to do a lot of prep work to get there but it seems like a great learning opportunity, and conversation piece. In my years running an agency, and now as a freelancers, I’ve realized that one of the toughest clients to take on is the entrepreneur who has invented something that he/she believes will revolutionize the world. They believe 100 % in the power of their product, which they should, but they are often not open to hearing any feedback they consider negative or tough questions. We were approached by many such entrepreneurs who were looking for an agency to take a “long view” on them. They promised that if we came in low at the start, our revenues would rise with the product’s success. We backed out of some and took on others but they were never long-term and we were never around long enough to reap the rewards. Few of the products lived up to their potential and for the couple that did, they moved on to global agencies when they “hit it big”. Plus, as you experienced, most startups are looking for pure publicity and even though they are paying a reduced fee, they will not tolerate reduced results. While there are a handful of amazing publicists who are on the phone all day talking to journalists, most of us prefer a more strategic approach without the stress and pressure of getting front-page coverage in the ever decreasing print media space.

    • Exactly, Louise. The odds of any firm getting rich when the company hits the jackpot (as all of them do, right?) are marginal, at best. The only way we would have done it (and even then we had qualms…) was to have a contract – notarized – clearly stating the terms of the arrangement.

      Interestingly, the executives didn’t have a problem with us asking the tough questions, saying that we weren’t asking anything they hadn’t already considered. Whether that’s true or not is unimportant; what is important is that the senior executives were open to the possibility of failure and wanted to do everything they could to prevent that. Smart guys on that front, to be sure. But asking consultants who barely know you to “take the long view” and “share the risk” isn’t a smart business strategy for finding the most qualified folks to help you revolutionize the world and make millions.

      Thanks so much for weighing in, Louise. Here’s hoping both our firms never have to face these kinds of Catch-22s anytime soon!

      Best regards,

      Roger

  2. Dana Hughens says:

    Great post, Roger. It is disappointing that this has to happen, and sadly, this is not a scenario that sounds unfamiliar. I’m leery when someone says that we can “get in on the ground floor” or “when we make money, you’ll make money.” However, you can’t always sniff out where these things are heading.

    A friend starting a business wanted to hire Clairemont to start working in February and asked if he could wait until July to pay us. I asked him how I should tell my employees that they wouldn’t get paycheck for those months in between. That seemed to help him understand the way our business works, but for someone to ask you to wait to be paid over an extended period of time (2 or 3 years?!?!) is just not feasible.

    • Yep, Dana, we were pretty much blindsided by that payment window, as well. Seriously, we’ve known this group for all of two weeks, and we’re supposed to trust that we’ll be paid in full after 24 months of work. Really? I mean, really?

      Thanks for tossing in your $0.02 worth, Dana. Talk soon, I hope!

  3. Glenn Gillen says:

    We should call it the Wimpy proposition. “I will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” I’ve also been in situations where we as the agency had to walk away due to unrealistic expectations (“We want national coverage, but only for this much money”) and being strung along while marketing execs try to mine us for ideas without actually hiring us. Best to move on.

    • Darn, Glenn. Wish I’d thought of the Wimpy proposition first! It is precisely what these guys were asking. Well, other than substituting two years for next Tuesday, of course…

      Thanks for your comment!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *